Software Requirements Specification: 3 Career Destroying Things to Avoid When Writing an SRS

Introduction: Software Requirements Specification

If you’ve ever sat in a project meeting wondering why the delivered software didn’t quite match what the business expected, you’re not alone. This gap between expectations and outcomes is exactly what a well-crafted Software Requirements Specification (SRS) is designed to bridge.

A Software Requirements Specification is more than just a technical document—it’s the blueprint that guides developers, testers, and stakeholders through the entire software development lifecycle. It defines the functionality, constraints, and performance criteria a solution must meet, ensuring that everyone involved is aligned on what’s being built and why.

In this article, we’ll break down what a Software Requirements Specification includes, when to create one, and how to tailor it for different project types. Whether you work in Agile, Waterfall, or somewhere in between, mastering the SRS process will elevate your value as a Business Analyst and set your project up for success.

Key Takeaways

  • A Software Requirements Specification defines the scope, functionality, and constraints of a system in a clear and measurable way, guiding the delivery team toward a shared goal.
  • The SRS is a communication tool, not just a document—it ensures that business needs are understood by technical teams and that nothing essential gets lost in translation.
  • Effective SRS documents are tailored to the project context. Agile projects may favour leaner specifications, while Waterfall initiatives often require more detailed, formal documentation.
  • A well-structured Software Requirements Specification reduces risk by highlighting ambiguities early, aligning expectations, and providing a reliable point of reference throughout development.
  • Using a standard SRS template helps ensure consistency and completeness, especially when working across diverse teams or highly regulated environments.

Avoid Ambiguity: Be Clear and Specific

When writing an SRS, every requirement should be explicit and measurable. Vague or ambiguous terms like “fast,” “user-friendly,” or “easy” can mean different things to different people, creating confusion and misaligned expectations. Instead, aim for requirements that specify exact standards or measurable outcomes.

Example: Instead of saying, “The software should load quickly,” specify, “The software should load within 2 seconds on a standard broadband connection.”

Tips to Reduce Ambiguity:

  • Use precise metrics for time, volume, or other quantitative requirements.
  • Define technical terms or acronyms to ensure everyone has a common understanding.
  • Regularly review the SRS with stakeholders to clarify any unclear terms.

Don’t Mix Functional and Non-Functional Requirements

Functional requirements (what the software does) and non-functional requirements (how it performs) serve different purposes and should be documented separately. Mixing the two can lead to confusion about priorities, which complicates design, development, and testing.

Functional Requirements: These detail specific actions the software must perform, like data processing, reporting, or user authentication.

Non-Functional Requirements: These specify how the software should operate, covering aspects like security, performance, usability, and reliability.

Example of Separation:
A functional requirement might be: “The software should allow users to reset their password via email.”

A corresponding non-functional requirement would be: “The software should support 1,000 password reset requests per minute.”

Tips to Keep Requirements Separate:

  • Use separate sections for functional and non-functional requirements.
  • Label each requirement to indicate its type and purpose.
  • Use diagrams, tables, or lists to organize the requirements for clarity.

Avoid Overloading with Technical Jargon

An SRS is intended for a range of readers, from project managers and stakeholders to developers and testers. Overusing technical jargon can make the document inaccessible to non-technical team members, leading to misunderstandings and missed details.

Example of Simplification: Instead of writing, “The system shall utilise asynchronous processing for API requests,” try, “The system should handle API requests in a way that doesn’t require users to wait for a response.”

Tips for Avoiding Jargon Overload:

  • Use clear, straightforward language where possible.
  • Provide a glossary for any necessary technical terms.
  • Review the SRS with non-technical stakeholders to ensure readability.

An effective SRS is a foundational document that helps guide software development teams toward a successful outcome. By avoiding ambiguity, keeping functional and non-functional requirements distinct, and minimising technical jargon, you can create a document that serves as a clear, accessible guide for everyone involved. Prioritizing these strategies in your SRS will help reduce confusion, improve collaboration, and lead to better project outcomes.

Final Thoughts

A clear, concise, and comprehensive Software Requirements Specification is one of the most powerful tools in a Business Analyst’s toolkit. It not only safeguards project success but also boosts your credibility as someone who can bridge the gap between vision and implementation.

Whether you’re documenting requirements for a small feature or a complex enterprise system, remember that your SRS should be purposeful—not just a formality. Prioritise clarity, traceability, and stakeholder engagement, and you’ll create a deliverable that drives real value.

You May Also Like…

Share
We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept
Privacy Policy